The potential downside there is with variations in dimensions between samples. Alternatively, some opt for a very tightly milled pocket and secure the optic laterally that way. Most competent milling jobs and aftermarket plates include fixed recoil bosses that index the optic and hold it in place laterally, taking some of the load off the fasteners. This becomes very stressful on the screws and it's also likely less repeatable as far as zero goes. The problem with setting up an optic with the MOS screw pattern is that you're then stuck expecting the fasteners to hold the optic down and in place laterally with recoil.
This is necessary to account for the variety in optic dimensions when you have a plate system. I think one of the biggest issues there is that the cut itself is too long for the optic. Except Trijicon's RMRcc introduced yet another new pattern.īuy an aftermarket slide with the cut of your choice, if you want to change, buy another aftermarket slide. And now with the 43X/48 MOS and P365 XL the RMSc pattern seems to be standardizing for small pistols. Trijicon has a bigger installed base with the RMR and is the "standard" ability to take abuse, so really, it should have become the standard. Since the military selected the DPP for the M17/M18 I would hope that pattern becomes a standard. First were the Doctor and JPoint patterns, then the RMR, and now the DPP. Open red dot sights for pistol are just all over the place. Aimpoint's 4-screw micro mount pattern is used by many other red dot companies, but notably not Trijicon with the MRO. The military selected M-Lok over Keymod, so things are standardizing there as well. The military standardized to the 1913 rail, and most everyone else has. I'm a little surprised, given the popularity of the MOS system, that optics makers aren't offering red dots that will mount directly to the MOS cut, with no intermediate plate.
0 kommentar(er)
